The sell-side risk ratio is a behavioral metric designed to assess the likelihood of Bitcoin holders selling their coins based on past accumulation and current market conditions. A low value suggests holders are unlikely to spend, while a high value indicates mounting incentives to realize gains or cut losses. By segmenting this ratio across long-term and short-term cohorts, we gain insight into how different parts of the market respond to volatility.

The sell-side risk ratio for long-term holders has only shown a modest uptick. On Mar. 23, this ratio sat at 745.8μ and gradually climbed to 0.001679 by Apr. 10. This increase is statistically minor, especially when contrasted with the sharp movements seen in short-term cohorts. It suggests that long-term holders are not engaging in panic selling or strategic exits despite geopolitical escalation and increased noise in the derivatives and ETF markets.

Their behavior instead aligns with a phase of ongoing accumulation. This group’s 30-day net position change has remained positive for an entire month, rising from 0.17% on Mar. 12 to 2.19% by Apr. 10. This indicates that coins held for long durations continue to move into stronger hands, either through direct acquisition or passive aging.

This accumulation is particularly noteworthy when juxtaposed with price action. Bitcoin traded above $82,000 in the days leading up to April 10, only to see a sharp drawdown that brought prices closer to the $76,000 level. The fact that long-term holders are still adding to positions during this price instability implies that they are unfazed by the current retracement and view the prevailing market environment as part of a larger accumulation phase. Historically, long-term holders tend to distribute during periods of euphoria and aggressive price discovery, not during geopolitical or macro-driven pullbacks.

The behavior of short-term holders paints a different picture. This group has been much more reactive, with the sell-side risk ratio fluctuating within a broader and more volatile range. Since the beginning of the year, this metric has moved between 425μ and 0.001855.

In the most recent stretch from April 6 to April 10, it jumped from 713μ to 0.001302, following the escalated tensions between the US and China, a broad sell-off in risk assets, and a meaningful outflow from spot Bitcoin ETFs. This sudden increase in sell-side risk from short-term participants suggests heightened sensitivity to price and macro triggers.

Unlike their long-term counterparts, short-term holders tend to have weaker convictions, higher leverage exposure, and a shorter time horizon. Their propensity to sell in reaction to volatility amplifies intraday swings and contributes to short-term liquidity stress. This is especially relevant given that the broader market has faced a $450 million outflow from Bitcoin ETFs over just a few sessions. The confluence of short-term selling pressure and ETF redemptions generates a reflexive loop where falling prices are exacerbated by weak hands selling into the fear.

However, the structural implication of this divergence is stabilizing rather than destabilizing. Short-term selling, in isolation, does not inherently compromise Bitcoin’s long-term trajectory. What matters is whether long-term holders respond to these sell-offs by reducing their own exposure. That has not happened so far. The persistent accumulation of long-term holders, even as the market corrects, implies an ongoing belief in the long-term thesis and suggests that the market is undergoing short-term rebalancing.

It is important to consider the broader macro backdrop to contextualize these behaviors. China’s announcement of a 125% tariff on US goods has sharply elevated geopolitical friction while pressuring global risk markets.

Gold has rallied as capital seeks safety, oil has declined amid demand fears, and US equity futures have weakened. Meanwhile, Bitcoin has struggled to find a clear direction due to its dual role as a risk-on speculative asset and a hedge against macroeconomic stress. In this context, it is natural to expect participants with lower time preferences to exit while more strategic capital consolidates positions.

The post Long-term holders continue to accumulate as short-term sellers react to market stress appeared first on CryptoSlate.