4
Apr, 2025
The future of DeFi isn’t on Ethereum — it’s on Bitcoin
Altcoin News, Bitcoin News, Crypto Analytics, Crypto Industries & Currency Updates
Opinion by: Matt Mudano, CEO of Arch Labs
Ethereum is struggling, and decentralized finance (DeFi) is suffering as a result. Layer-2 (L2) solutions have fractured liquidity, making capital inefficient. In search of greener pastures, the community has turned to Solana — only to find a memecoin-driven ecosystem fueled by pump-and-dump schemes, attracting liquidity extractors, and turning the chain into a playground for speculation and fraud.
DeFi needs a reset that returns to first principles and aligns with Satoshi’s original vision of a decentralized financial system. The only network capable of sustaining the next evolution of DeFi isn’t Ethereum or Solana. It’s Bitcoin.
DeFi is struggling on Ethereum
Ethereum was once the undisputed home of DeFi, but today, it’s clear that the ecosystem is struggling. The network’s roadmap constantly changes, with no clear path toward long-term sustainability.
L2 solutions were supposed to scale Ethereum. Instead, they’ve fractured DeFi into isolated liquidity silos. While L2s have lowered transaction fees, they now compete for liquidity rather than contributing to a unified financial system. The result? A fragmented landscape that makes capital inefficient and DeFi protocols harder to scale.
Ethereum’s proposed solution — chain abstraction — sounds promising in theory but fails in practice. The fundamental issue is a structural misalignment of incentives, and as a result, Ethereum is gradually losing its competitive edge in DeFi.
It’s time to ask: Can DeFi’s future lie in a fragmented Ethereum?
Solana isn’t the answer
With Ethereum losing its competitive edge, many developers and users have turned to Solana. The blockchain has seen an 83% increase in developer activity year-over-year, and its decentralized exchanges (DEXs) have outperformed Ethereum’s for five consecutive months.
There’s a fundamental problem: Solana’s DeFi growth isn’t built on sustainable financial applications — a memecoin frenzy fuels it.
The recent surge in activity isn’t driven by innovation in decentralized finance but by speculative trades. Following the TRUMP memecoin craze, the total extracted value from Solana’s memecoins ranged between $3.6 billion and $6.6 billion. This isn’t DeFi growth — it’s a liquidity extraction engine where short-term speculators cash in and move on.
Solana has real strengths. Its speed and low transaction costs make it ideal for high-frequency trading, and its ecosystem has made meaningful strides in decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePINs), AI and decentralized science, or DeSci. But the dominance of memecoin speculation has turned the chain into a playground for fraud and pump-and-dump schemes. That’s not the foundation DeFi needs.
Solana isn’t the answer if the goal is to build a lasting financial system.
Bitcoin DeFi is thriving
It’s time to return to first principles and build DeFi on the original blockchain: Bitcoin — the most trusted, decentralized network backed by the soundest money in the digital economy.
This is not just theoretical. Bitcoin DeFi is already experiencing explosive growth. Consider the numbers: Total value locked (TVL) in Bitcoin DeFi surged from $300 million in early 2024 to $5.4 billion as of Feb. 28, 2025 — a staggering 1,700% increase. The Bitcoin staking sector is dominating, with protocols like Babylon ($4.68 billion TVL), Lombard ($1.59 billion) and SolvBTC ($715 million) leading the charge. This demonstrates the growing demand for Bitcoin to become a productive asset rather than a passive store of value.
Recent: Bitcoin DeFi takes center stage
Bitcoin-native DeFi isn’t simply copying Ethereum’s playbook — it’s pioneering new financial models. Advancements in the space have introduced dual staking, allowing users to stake Bitcoin (BTC) alongside native tokens to enhance security and earn yields. Meanwhile, novel approaches to tokenizing Bitcoin’s hashrate turn mining power into collateral for lending, borrowing and staking, further expanding Bitcoin’s financial utility.
In addition, Ordinals and BRC-20 tokens have driven record-high transaction activity, with inscriptions reaching 66.7 million and generating $420 million in fees — highlighting the growing demand for tokenized assets on Bitcoin.
It is clear that Bitcoin is no longer just digital gold — it’s becoming the foundation for the next phase of decentralized finance.
The future of DeFi is on Bitcoin
The future of DeFi lies with Bitcoin, where incentives align with long-term value creation. Unlike Ethereum’s fragmented model and Solana’s speculative economy, Bitcoin-based DeFi is built on institutional-grade liquidity and sustainable growth.
As the largest and most liquid crypto asset, Bitcoin boasts a $1.7 trillion market cap and $94 billion in exchange-traded fund (ETF) holdings. Even a fraction of this liquidity migrating into DeFi would be a game-changer. Bitcoin holds over $1 trillion in untapped liquidity and continues to attract strong interest from institutional investors and sovereign wealth funds, with governments already exploring it as a potential reserve asset.
Several projects are already building on Bitcoin, building a sustainable ecosystem where users can hold the most trusted digital asset while making it productive through DeFi mechanisms.
Ethereum had its moment. Solana had its hype. It’s Bitcoin’s turn to actualize Satoshi’s original vision of a decentralized financial system.
Opinion by: Matt Mudano, CEO of Arch Labs.
This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
…
Learn MoreThe future of DeFi isn’t on Ethereum — it’s on Bitcoin
4
Apr, 2025
Meme Coins Tumble After Tariff News While Lightchain AI Nears Presale Finale
Altcoin News, Bitcoin News, Crypto Industries & Currency Updates
This content is provided by a sponsor. PRESS RELEASE. The crypto market headlines are buzzing once again, and it’s a mix of ups and downs. Meme coins have taken a hard hit after the latest tariff news, while a shrewd spotlight now shines on Lightchain AI’s presale as it enters its final stages. Crypto investors […] …
Learn MoreMeme Coins Tumble After Tariff News While Lightchain AI Nears Presale Finale
4
Apr, 2025
Has Michael Saylor's Strategy built a house of cards?
Altcoin News, Bitcoin News, Crypto Analytics, Crypto Industries & Currency Updates
Strategy Inc., formerly MicroStrategy, has discarded its core product, assumed a new identity, swallowed over half a million BTC, spawned equity classes with double-digit yields, and inspired an arsenal of leveraged ETFs — a unique and significant market phenomenon.
Michael Saylor’s firm has constructed a comprehensive financial framework based around Bitcoin, tying its corporate performance directly to the cryptocurrency’s price fluctuations. As a result, Strategy’s common stock has evolved into a proxy for Bitcoin exposure, its preferred shares offer yields tied to cryptocurrency risk, and a series of leveraged and inverse ETFs now track its equity movements, all fundamentally connected to its substantial Bitcoin holdings.
Recently, there was an announcement of another purchase by MSTR (Strategy’s common equity) of close to $2 billion of BTC in one clip, inviting even more raised eyebrows and caution.
This concern is not merely because of Strategy’s bet on Bitcoin, but the market architecture which has grown around it. A parallel financial ecosystem has emerged, binding its fate to a risk asset that, as Saylor himself notes, trades 24/7. He’s championed the idea that “volatility is vitality,” suggesting that this constant motion draws attention, sustains interest, and breathes life into the entire “Strategyverse” and its related equities.
To some, this is financial innovation in its purest form: bold, unhedged, and transformative. To others, it is a fragile lattice of conviction and leverage, one black swan away from unraveling.
From MicroStrategy to Strategy: A pivot into the abyss or the vanguard?
MicroStrategy, once a staid business intelligence software provider, has been reborn as Strategy Inc., a corporate avatar synonymous with Bitcoin. The company has made an unabashed leap from offering data analytics to becoming a full-throttle Bitcoin acquisition vehicle.
The numbers speak for themselves. As of March 30, Strategy holds 528,185 BTC, acquired for approximately $35.63 billion at an average price of about $67,458 per Bitcoin. The most recent tranche of BTC in 2025 involved the acquisition of 22,048 BTC for around $1.92 billion, at an average of roughly $86,969 per coin. Year to date, Strategy has achieved a BTC yield of 11.0 percent.
This shift has transformed MSTR into a proxy Bitcoin ETF of sorts, albeit with operational leverage and corporate risk baked in. But unlike the SEC-blessed spot ETFs, MSTR offers amplified exposure: it behaves like Bitcoin, only more so due to the company’s use of leverage and financial engineering.
Read more: MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin debt loop: Stroke of genius or risky gamble?
Now, with the introduction of STRK (8% yield) and STRF (10% yield), Strategy has expanded its reach. These preferred shares offer fixed-income style returns, but their performance is deeply tethered to Bitcoin’s fate. When Bitcoin surges, yield-bearing holders cheer. They’re still promised yield when it falls, but their capital risk climbs.
Financial innovation? Yes. Structural risk? Most certainly.
Market performance of Strategy-adjacent equities (Base = 100). Source: TradingView
When indexed to 100 at the start of 2025, the performance of Strategy and related instruments demonstrates the effects of volatility and leverage in the Bitcoin-correlated financial ecosystem. As of early April 2025, MSTR has declined moderately by approximately 8%, tracking the broader downward trajectory of Bitcoin itself, which is down around 16%.
The company’s preferred shares, STRF and STRK, have slightly appreciated above their initial indexed values, reflecting investor preference for dividend stability amidst market volatility.
MSTU and MSTX have markedly underperformed, dropping around 37% to 38% from their normalized starting points, due to volatility drag and compounding losses inherent in leveraged daily reset structures.
This YTD snapshot underscores how leverage magnifies returns and the potential risks associated with short-term market movements.
Inside the Strategyverse: Bitcoin as treasury, equity as exposure
Strategy’s operating income, still derived from its legacy software business, now plays second fiddle to its crypto balance sheet.
However, the firm hasn’t just stockpiled coins; it has created a latticework of financial instruments that reflect and refract BTC price action. MSTR is no longer merely equity; it has become a high-beta Bitcoin play. STRK and STRF are yield-bearing hybrids, offering fixed returns yet functioning like risk instruments in a crypto-linked treasury experiment.
The structural concern is this: by tying every new yield product, equity issuance and debt vehicle to Bitcoin, Strategy has effectively replaced diversification with correlation. Critics argue there is no hedge here, only degrees of bullishness.
This raises the concern that a company can maintain corporate solvency and investor trust when its financial ecosystem is built atop the volatility of a single, historically unstable asset.
Leveraged and inverse products
Where there is heat, there will be leverage. The market has responded to Strategy’s gravitational pull by creating a suite of leveraged and inverse products tied to MSTR, giving retail and institutional players access to turbocharged Bitcoin exposure without holding the asset directly.
Investors seeking amplified returns in anticipation of price gains can deploy strategies such as MSTU (T Rex) or MSTX (Defiance), both offering 2x long daily returns, or MST3.L, which provides 3x long exposure listed in London.
Conversely, investors expecting price declines might choose SMST, offering 2x short exposure, or MSTS.L and 3SMI, each providing 3x short exposure listed in London.
These instruments are typically employed by traders looking for short-term directional bets and should be handled cautiously due to daily reset mechanics and volatility risks.
These are not traditional ETFs. They are complex, synthetic instruments with daily reset mechanisms and inherent decay risks. Volatility drag ensures that even in a sideways market, leveraged longs underperform. For shorts, the risk of a short squeeze, particularly in parabolic bull runs, is ever-present.
Related: Trade war puts Bitcoin’s status as safe-haven asset in doubt
In practical terms, these products allow traders to speculate on MSTR’s price with minimal capital outlay. But they also amplify misalignment. A trader betting on Bitcoin’s month-long trend might find that their 3x long MSTR ETF underperforms expectations due to compounding losses on down days.
The strategic risk here lies in mismatch: retail investors may perceive these ETFs as direct Bitcoin exposure with leverage. In reality, they are trading a proxy of a proxy, subject to corporate news, dilution, and macro shifts.
Exposure at different levels of the Strategyverse. Source: Dr. Michael Tabone
Is Strategy’s strategy conviction or leverage risk?
Between 2020 and 2025, Strategy has executed over a dozen capital raises via convertible notes, ATM equity programs and, most recently, the STRF preferred offering priced at a 10 percent yield. The March 2025 raise helped fund the latest $1.92 billion Bitcoin buy.
It is not just about buying Bitcoin. It is about the market constructing a meta-structure where every market instrument, common stock, preferred shares and synthetic ETFs feeds into the same gravitational pull. Each capital raise buys more Bitcoin. Each purchase pushes up sentiment. Each ETF amplifies exposure. This feedback loop has become the hallmark of Strategy’s financial architecture.
With each new issuance, however, dilution risk grows. STRK and STRF investors depend not only on Strategy’s solvency but also on Bitcoin’s long-term appreciation. If BTC stumbles into a prolonged bear market, can those 10% yields continue?
For investors, Strategy’s approach presents clear opportunities and risks. It offers a streamlined pathway for gaining exposure to Bitcoin through familiar financial instruments, combining elements of equity, fixed income, and derivatives. At the same time, investors must carefully consider the volatility of Bitcoin itself, the potential impacts of dilution from continuous capital raises, and the overall health of Strategy’s balance sheet.
Ultimately, the investment outcome will heavily depend on the trajectory of cryptocurrency markets, the Strategy’s financial management and evolving regulatory landscapes.
Magazine: Financial nihilism in crypto is over — It’s time to dream big again
…
Learn MoreHas Michael Saylor's Strategy built a house of cards?